I have never felt that investing is like working. It is more like playing ten parallel games of poker.Peter Gyllenhammar
I recently read Guy Thomas’ excellent book “Free Capital: How 12 Private Investors made millions in the Stock Market” and learned a few things.
The book profiles 12 UK private investors who left their career to invest. I found the book an enjoyable and easy read.
The depth of the interviews is quite good. It’s easy to see the author is very knowledgeable in stock market investing (i.e. he’s an independent investor himself).
The book is agnostic on investment philosophy and there’s no larger narrative. Rather, the book is similar to the all-time classics Market Wizards or Inside the House of Money or John Train’s The Money Masters. The main difference is it profiles succesful non-“professionals”.
As the book does not have a big narrative, I’ll share some interesting concepts and quotes I picked up. The book is also full of “concept boxes” that explain certain touched-upon concepts. Even for seasoned investors, you will learn a few things. I will not share these.
Interesting thoughts, resource and quotes. Unsurprisingly, as an electrical engineer myself, the “hard science” investors’ thoughts resonated most:
- most investors used the bulletin boards to share info with others ADVFN (which I find useful as well for our Dart Group plc position), Fool, iii.co.uk, stockopedia.co.uk
Investing is not like Olympic diving: there are no marks for degree of difficultySushil
- optimal betting size (i.e. Kelly Betting) is more cautious to downside risks than simply going by “expected returns” (i.e. probability-weighted return). Optimal betting uses logarithmic returns: while an investment with 50% chance of +25% return and 50% change of -20% has a 5% “expected return”, it has a 0% expected logarithmic return. Another way to see how an investor “gets” 0% and not the expected return is by continuously investing in the above 50/50 +25%/-20%-type of investments: +25%’s that are equally followed by -20% return 0% over time
- Path-indendepent thinking: occupational identity can be a mental constraint. Don’t let your thinking be constrained by your identity.
I don’t seem to have very much influence on Walter. That’s one of his strengths: nobody seems to have much influence on him.Warren Buffett on walter schloss
- look for motivated sellers
- better be right than consistent
The best decisions in the stock market attract no applauseVernon
- structuring your investments by writing down a brief 1) thesis 2) secondary factors 3) “hygiene factors” (absence of red flags)
- investing is a game with negative scoring: avoid mistakes, learn from other people’s mistakes
- optimal rate of error: it is not worth knowing everything about a company, because every point investigated has a time-opportunity cost. Your aim in checking “hygiene factors” is not to find out everything, but to reduce your error rate to an acceptable level
On talking to insiders and activism:
- strategic naïvety: it can help to appear less sophisicated than you are. It helps persuade insiders to open up.
- manage company meetings: at AGM’s, set expectations at the start of the meeting by informing insiders you have several questions to ask. Take note of who answers which questions and how they interact.
- create a paper trail: putting your communication on paper makes it harder for directors to evade their fiduciary duties and ignore you
Another interesting – and complimentary – review can be found here.